Advising / Consulting / Family Business / Issues in the Family Enterprise / Leadership / Legacy / NextGen / Philanthropy

Research Applied: FBR Précis for the Practitioner

The PractitionerWe continue our series of Research Applied with summaries and practical applications of two articles on philanthropy from the September Special Issue of FBR: Social Issues in the Family Enterprise

  • Does Family Involvement Make Firms Donate More? Empirical Evidence from Chinese Private Firms
  • Firm Philanthropy in Small and Medium-Sized Family Firms: The Effects of Family Involvement in Ownership and Management

Summary 1: Does Family Involvement Make Firms Donate More? Empirical Evidence From Chinese Private Firms

Junsheng Dou, Zhongyuan Zhang and Emma Su

This article’s research question is: Whether and under what condition family involvement positively impacts firms’ charitable donations?

The authors studied 2,921 private Chinese firms’ charitable donations, which are seen as a main part of firms’ proactive stakeholder engagement (PSE). Donations are a discretionary responsibility, which means that firms make their own decisions on whether and how much to donate. Donations also put pressure on firms’ flow of cash and other resources, and thus are short-term sacrifices for the potential long-term advantages of enhancing firms’ reputations and public images and accumulating moral and social capital for the firm.

The authors define family involvement as composed of three dimensions:

  • Family ownership describes the ownership percentage of the family
  • Family management describes how many family members are practically involved in management
  • Family duration of control describes how long the family has control over the firm

The authors argue that these three dimensions of family involvement positively influence the level of donations. They further tested whether or not the willingness of the next generation to assume control of the firm altered these relationships.

The importance of measuring the influence of family involvement on charitable donations lies in its theoretical implications since it demonstrates the different logic attributed to family firm owners as compared to nonfamily ones. An empirical validation like this study could help researchers and practitioners answer questions such as:

  • Do family firms really have a different decision making process?
  • Do family owners really sacrifice economic short-term gains for the long-term ones?
  • What dimension of family involvement influences the social initiative at the firm level?
  • What is the negative influence of the next generation’s unwillingness to assume control of the firm on charitable donations?

This study found that family ownership and duration of control were positively associated with charitable giving. The study further shows that family percentage of ownership and a longer duration of family control have a significant positive influence on charitable donations.

However, the next generation’s unwillingness to assume control of the firm weakened the positive family ownership-charitable giving relationship. This study reinforces the role of the next generation of family business leaders on the long-term orientation and pro-social behavior of family firms.

Practitioners will find that this study continues the stream of recent family business research which demonstrates the power of non-financial pursuits in family firms. Practitioners need to continue to be cognizant of the strength of the non-financial pursuits of their clients.

Read the article here.

Summary 2: Firm Philanthropy in Small and Medium-Sized Family Firms: The Effects of Family Involvement in Ownership and Management

Giovanna Campopiano, Alfredo De Massis and Francesco Chirico

This study of 130 small and medium sized firms in northern Italy was conducted with the purpose of learning about the effects of family involvement in ownership and management on firm philanthropy. (Small and medium-sized firms are defined as having an annual turnover of between 2 and 50 million Euros.) The authors describe “firm philanthropy” as:

  • altruistic activities intended to serve others
  • the act of donating money, goods and services to support a socially beneficial or humanitarian cause
  • a discretionary wealth transfer of net income to stakeholders

The study draws on stewardship theory, which considers the family as a source of competitive advantage based upon three main aspects:

  • significant investment in the business and its future
  • virtually unconditional funding of this investment
  • a strong willingness to pursue long-term goals even at the expense of short-term gains

Social networks and reputational capital, which can be fueled by philanthropy, are key resources to maintain competitive advantages.

The authors describe the study results as supporting the propositions that the propensity for philanthropic activity in a family firm:

  • increases with the degree of family ownership
  • increases as ownership becomes more dispersed among family members

Reasons for this propensity include the higher motivation in family owned businesses to create a multi-generational family enterprise which, in turn, depends upon a number of factors, some of which are strengthened through firm philanthropy, such as:

  • building the reputation of the firm
  • helping to build a working environment that rewards support and collaboration
  • fostering and developing a skilled workforce
  • making connections to stakeholders in the community

As the number of family owners involved in the business increases, their social networks are likely to expand as well.

In a somewhat counterintuitive perspective, the authors interpret some mixed survey data to conclude that a greater concentration of family members as managers, in proportion to all family members involved in the company, reduces the propensity for firm philanthropy. They argue that a significant number of family managers leads to more conflict, more divergent views of priorities, less stewardship behavior and more allocation of resources inwardly toward business needs. Further studies are needed to determine whether these propositions apply to larger family firms or might change with a larger sample size across countries and cultures.

Practitioners should consider some useful lessons that arise from the authors’ work. To maximize the positive impact of firm philanthropy on the long-term success of a family firm, efforts are needed to help family firms understand the benefits of firm philanthropy and its relationship to business sustainability. Governance efforts are important to help align family managers, family employees and family ownership goals for firm philanthropy. The larger the number of family managers in the firm, the more challenging the governance process to focus and sustain firm philanthropy commitment.

Read the article here.

About the Contributor:

Karen Vinton 2012Karen L. Vinton, Ph.D. is a 1999 Barbara Hollander Award winner and Professor Emeritus of Business at the College of Business at Montana State University, where she founded the University’s Family Business Program. An FFI Fellow, she has served on the FFI board of directors and chaired the Body of Knowledge committee. From 1997 through 2011, Vinton served on the editorial board of Family Business Review and is the current assistant editor. Karen can be reached at klvinton700@gmail.com.

Yours in Practice,

The Practitioner

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s